Allison Lazette-Magnan and Jeffrey Murray secured a dismissal of a provider suit for PIP benefits by showing that Plaintiff could not recover because their primary lay and expert witness was under federal criminal indictment and would refuse to testify at trial under his 5th Amendment privileges. The Court decided Defendant’s motion based on the strength of our motion alone, dispensing with the need for oral argument.
No Oral Argument Needed, Plaintiff’s Claims Dismissed Where Its Expert Was Under Federal Indictment
Share:
More Posts
Stolen Vehicle Leads to Dismissed Claims
Jeff Murray secured an order dismissing plaintiff’s claims, with prejudice, on a motion for summary disposition. The underlying claimant had stolen her mother’s vehicle, gotten
Housing Accommodations Which Do Not Have the Purpose of Effectuating an Injured Person’s Care, Recovery, Rehabilitation, Are Not Compensable as Allowable Expenses under the No-Fault Act
Nicholas E. Girimont wrote our motion for partial summary disposition as to the claims submitted by Residential Care Solutions, LLC (“RCS”) which was seeking $82,268.48
All Claims Dismissed, Insurer Not Responsible for Adult Daughter
After reviewing a motion drafted by Jason D. Osbourn and the plaintiff’s opposing response, a District Court Judge has agreed that even though the daughter
Summary Disposition Granted, Unrelated Bills Dismissed
Plaintiff brought claims for first-party PIP benefits following a December 2017 motor vehicle accident. Mitch D. Parsons was able to show that certain bills incurred after the
