Plaintiffs brought claims for first-party PIP benefits following a deadly accident. Allison Lazette-Magnan and Jeffrey Murray convinced the court to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims altogether because Plaintiff’s had not paid their insurance premiums prior to the subject accident. The court found that the insurer had followed all of the requirements under Michigan law to cancel an insurance policy and Plaintiffs had done nothing to correct their omissions prior to the cancellation date. That ruling was upheld, even in the face of Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Disposition Granted and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration Denied Where They Failed to Pay Their Insurance Premiums
Jeff Murray secured an order dismissing plaintiff’s claims, with prejudice, on a motion for summary disposition. The underlying claimant had stolen her mother’s vehicle, gotten
Housing Accommodations Which Do Not Have the Purpose of Effectuating an Injured Person’s Care, Recovery, Rehabilitation, Are Not Compensable as Allowable Expenses under the No-Fault Act
Nicholas E. Girimont wrote our motion for partial summary disposition as to the claims submitted by Residential Care Solutions, LLC (“RCS”) which was seeking $82,268.48
After reviewing a motion drafted by Jason D. Osbourn and the plaintiff’s opposing response, a District Court Judge has agreed that even though the daughter
Plaintiff brought claims for first-party PIP benefits following a December 2017 motor vehicle accident. Mitch D. Parsons was able to show that certain bills incurred after the