Jeff Murray secured an order dismissing plaintiff’s claims, with prejudice, on a motion for summary disposition. The underlying claimant had stolen her mother’s vehicle, gotten into an accident, and later sought medical care. Because the vehicle had been unlawfully taken at the time of the accident, no coverage could be afforded under the No Fault Act, and Plaintiff’s claims were dismissed altogether.
Stolen Vehicle Leads to Dismissed Claims
Housing Accommodations Which Do Not Have the Purpose of Effectuating an Injured Person’s Care, Recovery, Rehabilitation, Are Not Compensable as Allowable Expenses under the No-Fault Act
Nicholas E. Girimont wrote our motion for partial summary disposition as to the claims submitted by Residential Care Solutions, LLC (“RCS”) which was seeking $82,268.48
After reviewing a motion drafted by Jason D. Osbourn and the plaintiff’s opposing response, a District Court Judge has agreed that even though the daughter
Plaintiff brought claims for first-party PIP benefits following a December 2017 motor vehicle accident. Mitch D. Parsons was able to show that certain bills incurred after the
Nicholas E. Girimont drafted and argued our Motion for Summary Disposition which sought dismissal based upon a valid recission of the policy as a result